The Link from a Communication Satellite to a Small Ground Terminal.
ResearchPublished 1964
A restatement (with minor revisions) of material presented in "Design and use of an early communication satellite system," RM-3514, July 1963. The paper discusses technical factors of small ground terminal parameters, capacity for antenna patterns, costs for the receiving aperture, and link losses.
Topics
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1964
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 29
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-2884
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Feldman, Nathaniel E., The Link from a Communication Satellite to a Small Ground Terminal. RAND Corporation, P-2884, 1964. As of September 24, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2884.html
Feldman, Nathaniel E., The Link from a Communication Satellite to a Small Ground Terminal. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1964. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2884.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.