Cover: Some recent signs of reaction against prevailing Soviet doctrinal emphasis on missiles

Some recent signs of reaction against prevailing Soviet doctrinal emphasis on missiles

Published 1964

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback5 pages $20.00

Over the past few years, the primacy of strategic missile forces has become a tenet of Soviet military doctrine. It would now appear, judging from recently published Soviet military discussions, that a countertrend has begun--representing a reaction in some quarters against the new orthodoxy embodying such Khrushchevian strategic notions as the absolute primacy of nuclear missile weapons. In part, this reaction may represent merely a continuation of the modernist-traditionalist debate. Some military writers from both schools have now begun to suggest, however, that such ideas have been carried too far, threatening to create a new orthodoxy that could cripple the creative development of Soviet military theory and of other forces, particularly aviation.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.