Hallucinogenic Drugs

A Perspective with Special Reference to Peyote and Cannabis

by William Hersche McGlothlin


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback84 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

A study of the use and effect of peyote and Cannabis sativa (marihuana). It is intended to reduce uncertainty surrounding benefits or perils inherent in the use of LSD and other hallucinogens. The history of peyotism among the American Indians is examined, including a detailed review of method and frequency of use, incidence of addiction and psychosis, motivation, relation to alcoholism, socioeconomic and psychological differences between peyotists and non-peyotists. A similar review of the use of cannabis in the United States and other parts of the world is presented. Data on peyote and cannabis are correlated with those on LSD in an effort to predict the future direction and accompanying problems of hallucinogens in the present culture.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.