Indian transportation: a sectoral approach to developmental constraints.
ResearchPublished 1966
ResearchPublished 1966
Detailed analysis of the more important constraints on the transportation sector of the Indian economy. It shows how useful the sectoral approach can be in determining the obstacles to economic development in less-developed countries, as opposed to identifying the obstacles as a lack of technical competence, insufficient domestic savings, a balance-of-payment problem, political instability, and inadequate education and motivation. The rates and costs of Indian railroads, a monopoly directly administered by a ministry of the Indian government, and the government restrictions on Indian highway transportation, a sector that depends largely on private production of motor vehicles, are evaluated. The author suggests that Indian transport policies could be coordinated by the operation of a competitive market force with railway rates reflecting costs (a solution not seriously discussed in India). 35 pp. Bibliog.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.