Cover: The mythography of military R&D

The mythography of military R&D

Published 1966

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback25 pages $20.00

The term mythography applies to the situation in which unreal representation of events and their causation becomes widely acceptable and is eventually transcribed into a procedural ritual. In military R&D, it is not uncommon for casual observations to be transformed into assumptions, which in time become doctrine and ultimately rules of procedure. One example is the assumption that careful preplanning and tight scheduling of complete system developments and the early integration of subsystems result in the earliest availability of fully capable equipment. Another is that an intensively managed concurrent development can markedly accelerate the availability of fully developed systems. The paper argues that prescriptional doctrine and procedure are suspect and that each program should be considered on its own merits and in terms of its own environment.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.