Astronomy from the Moon

A Logistic Appraisal

Roger Chandler Moore, G. F. Schilling

ResearchPublished 1966

A methodology is available for quantitatively evaluating the implications of superimposing scientific requirements on an existing or planned supply support system for space operations. For one application, a detailed scenario was prepared for an astronomical research program that culminates in the establishment of a lunar-based observatory. The scientific requirements of this scenario were then added to the basic requirements for the construction and operation of a manned lunar base over an eight-year period. The numerical results indicate that such a research program is logistically feasible and could be conducted during the next decades. Further analysis suggests that future scientific space missions, in other disciplines as well as in astronomy, can fruitfully be planned in terms of weights and dimensions orders of magnitude larger than those of today.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
12 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1966
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 12
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-3377

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Moore, Roger Chandler and G. F. Schilling, Astronomy from the Moon: A Logistic Appraisal, RAND Corporation, P-3377, 1966. As of October 10, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3377.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Moore, Roger Chandler and G. F. Schilling, Astronomy from the Moon: A Logistic Appraisal. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1966. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3377.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.