Strategy and organization in public land policy

Expert InsightsPublished 1966

Discussion of the relationship between resource policy objectives and policy administration. The author considers not only the physical, economic, and institutional constraints on public land management, but analyzes the strategic objectives of land management. He emphasizes that, although many improvements can be instituted within the present organizational framework of the Federal Government, the basic need for more integration and coordination of natural resource management and development decisions can be achieved only through substantial changes in the organization of the Government's administration. 28 pp. Ref.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1966
  • Pages: 30
  • Document Number: P-3403

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Strategy and organization in public land policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1966. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3403.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.