The impact of the new technology on command system design

Andrew E. Wessel

Expert InsightsPublished 2004

An appraisal of the newer capabilities for on-line interactions between users and automated systems in command system design. Current technology offers a potential software development that would permit on-site, on-line functional programming. Both the user and the technical developer must be involved in the pilot program in such a way that the development agency is made aware of the deficiencies discovered during the implementation of the pilot program. Such a joint user/technical developer pilot program, under the auspices of the user command, would meet this need. 11 pp.

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2004
  • Pages: 15
  • Document Number: P-3409

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Wessel, Andrew E., The impact of the new technology on command system design. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2004. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3409.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.