The Coming Computer Utility -- Laissez-Faire, Licensing, or Regulation?
Expert InsightsPublished 1967
Expert InsightsPublished 1967
The growth of the computer industry, which presses upon existing regulatory processes, makes necessary a re-examination of the entire regulatory structure for data transmission. At present, communications suppliers are highly regulated, while computer companies are not. The cost for computation is dropping so rapidly that the cost of the communication needed to tie together many users of a single machine is now the overriding cost limitation. Concentrating the traffic from a large number of users in order to share expensive transmission circuits is illegal unless a single company is involved (giving a disproportionate advantage to large companies). The most basic regulation mechanisms needed by future computer utilities are professional licensing standards to aid in safeguarding privacy of information; removing the economic advantage to large companies; and providing free exchange across systems.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.