Download

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Reproduction of a paper presented at a conference on Modern Strategic Analysis held by the Security Studies Project of UCLA, 13 January 1967. The evolution of the scenario as a device for conducting war games is traced. The political-military scenario provides a context for considering defense decisions, contingency plans, and a background against which war games may be conducted. To be effective and widely accepted, scenarios should be modeled as closely as possible on the existing world, or if departures are made, the changes should be explained as completely as possible. In some cases, relevancy rather than credibility should predominate; otherwise, research into future problems can scarcely be undertaken.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.