It has been asserted that there is ordinarily a stable equilibrium outcome to a vote trading situation with many decisions and many voters. Based on certain assumptions, two theorems are proved that cast doubt on the validity of that assertion: (1) For an outcome to be stable with vote trading it must be identical with the outcome without vote trading. (2) If vote trading is "beneficial" in the sense that some majority set can improve the payoffs to all of its members over those without vote trading, there is no stable outcome with vote trading. 8 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.