Equivalent Stationary Measures for the M
Expert InsightsPublished 1967
A new proof that the stationary probability of finding i customers at a random point in time in an M/G/1 queueing system equals the stationary probability of finding i customers in the system just after a random service completion epoch. In an M/G/1 queue there is a single channel with arrivals generated by a random process. Service times are independent of each other and of arrival spacings. The queue discipline is irrelevant as long as it does not use information related to processing times. Traffic intensity is assumed to be less than 1. This proof may serve as a model for relating the stationary measure of an imbedded Markov chain to the stationary measure of the original queueing process. As examples, it turns out that these measures are also equal for the G/M/1 queue but not for bulk queues. 7 pp. Refs.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1967
- Document Number: P-3590
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.