Agriculture in the Industrialization of Communist China and the Soviet Union : A Comment.

Nancy Nimitz

Expert InsightsPublished 1967

Agriculture in the industrialization of Communist China and the Soviet Union is discussed in the context of Stalinist development strategy and the role of collectivization in a Soviet economy. Indications are that, within a Soviet environment, the future as well as the past belongs to collective farms. The argument for collectivization may be stated thus: a short-run triumph, involving increasing penalties as time passes, but the most expedient solution in the long run for a country that professes adherence to Marxist principles. 7 pp. Ref.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1967
  • Pages: 7
  • Document Number: P-3654

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Nimitz, Nancy, Agriculture in the Industrialization of Communist China and the Soviet Union : A Comment. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1967. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3654.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.