The Technology Gap : Analysis and Appraisal.
Expert InsightsPublished 1967
An examination of the technological gap between the United States and Europe in the context of its historical perspective and postwar developments. The "gap" is not new but has existed since the nineteenth century. It has been erroneously viewed by some as a single phenomenon created by increased world trade, increased U.S. direct investment in Europe, growing U.S. power in science, and U.S. military dominance. Analysis shows that the military and general economic consequences of the gap are separable, and that the technological spillover from massive military R&D is negligible. Although universal education and large markets are important, competition is a most important factor in fostering overall technological progress. 34 pp.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1967
- Pages: 34
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-3694-1
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.