A Study of the University of Minnesota Library School Graduates, 1951-1964.
Expert InsightsPublished 1967
An analysis of educational and professional data from questionnaires and registration files of the 370 M.A. graduates of the Minnesota Library School from the time the first degree was awarded in 1951 to August 1964. Men constituted 37% (as compared with a national average for library schools of 24%). Of those employed in the field, 48% worked for colleges and universities, 25% in public libraries, 16% in school libraries, and 12% in special libraries and research centers. Sixty-nine graduates were heads of departments or multiperson libraries (36 others ran one-man libraries), and 53 were children's librarians, two of the three highest-paid categories. Reference librarians were in the lower salary ranges. 80 pp. Bibliog.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1967
- Pages: 80
- Document Number: P-3740
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.