Cover: Communications Goals for Los Angeles

Communications Goals for Los Angeles

A Working Paper for the Los Angeles Goals Program

Published 1968

by Leonard G. Chesler, Herbert S. Dordick


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback37 pages $20.00

A technological and cost analysis of three modes of TV transmission — UHF, VHF, and Cable — prepared for the Los Angeles Goals Program of the City Planning Department. Research indicates that 100 percent of ghetto residents use TV as a news source, while newspapers are used by only 3 percent as a news source; therefore, a program using TV to communicate with the ghetto should be instituted immediately first, for intra-ghetto communication, and, ultimately, through a city built and operated network. On the basis of flexibility and, in reality, feasibility, a cable system seems the most promising because of its ability to adapt to other educational needs.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.