Style in the Politics and Foreign Policy of Communist China.

Melvin Gurtov

ResearchPublished 1968

In this analysis of the interrelationships between internal politics and external policy in China under Mao, the term "style" is used to indicate characteristics of one leadership's way of dealing with its society and the world. The sense of "Chineseness" and China's destiny, authority and unanimity, contradiction and struggle are elements of style in Communist China's foreign and domestic politics. Mao's style has been to regard struggle as inevitable, to interpret resistance to struggle as the signal for its intensification, and to reject reconciliation by compromise. There are indications that Mao is fighting a losing battle against a slow-moving tide of change that is not induced by hostility to Maoist ideology or by a desire to sweep Mao out of power, but rather by a belief that Maoism, with its emphasis on revolutionization, must be modified if it is to remain relevant to China's needs and serve China's national interests. 38 pp.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
38 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1968
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 38
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-3775

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Gurtov, Melvin, Style in the Politics and Foreign Policy of Communist China. RAND Corporation, P-3775, 1968. As of September 4, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3775.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Gurtov, Melvin, Style in the Politics and Foreign Policy of Communist China. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1968. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3775.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.