This review of defense policies and developments in the Federal Republic of Germany focuses on a reversal in national priorities that occurred at the end of 1967: For the first time in the Federal Republic's history, domestic policy has been given top priority in contrast to the past one and a half decades during which the Western Alliance and rearmament have been emphasized. This reversal of priorities and the search for a new military policy reflect significant changes in German opinion and international circumstances. The expectations that led Adenauer to arm the Federal Republic as a member of a Western, anti-Soviet security community have, in part, been fulfilled, but the reunification of Germany has not yet been achieved. The military strength of the Western Alliance is not likely to contribute to this goal. Two issues dominate the recurrent German defense debate: (1) local resistance vs. deterrent strike forces, and (2) national vs. alliance-oriented forces. 19 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.