Adult Education Goals for Los Angeles : A Working Paper for the Los Angeles Goals Program.
Expert InsightsPublished 1968
An examination of the needs of adult education programs in Los Angeles by 1980. The total demand in the three levels of institutions--University of California Extension, junior colleges, and public schools--will range from 2.0 to 2.6 million adults. The major percentage will be in the 21 to 55 age group, the group that contributes most heavily to the area's productivity and tax base. The greatly increased need for teachers, facilities, and funds is obvious and will be felt most severely at the public school level. Several Educational Television programs are described as one solution. This paper was prepared for the Technology Goals Committee of the City Planning Department of Los Angeles. 17 pp.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1968
- Pages: 17
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-3808
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.