What Do Referential Indices Refer To?
Expert InsightsPublished 1968
Expert InsightsPublished 1968
A reexamination of Chomsky's concept of a referential index that ties together noun phrases referring to the same, assumedly real-world, entity. The intricate and recalcitrant bundle of problems about noun phrases includes the distinctions of definite/indefinite, generic/nongeneric, and specific/nonspecific noun phrases; anaphoric vs. deictic noun phrases and pronouns; and restrictive vs. appositive relative clauses and modifiers. Simple English (and Finnish) sentences are examined to show that an indefinite noun phrase does not always establish the existence of an external permanent referent. Instead, the term "discourse referent" is used to indicate an entity that can be referred to by a pronoun or revived by a definite description. Even nonspecific noun phrases create discourse referents, provided they appear in a clause taken to be true. (Presented at the UCLA Linguistics Colloquium, April 26, 1968.) (See also P-3756.)
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.