Book Review: Inside Bureaucracy by Anthony Downs

John P. Crecine

Expert InsightsPublished 1968

Downs' book has as its purpose to "develop a useful theory of bureaucratic decisionmaking." While the reviewer finds the axioms, laws, and propositions "packed with interesting and significant research questions and bureaucratic folklore," he asserts that it "is really about bureaucratic structure and contains relatively little that is unique about bureaucratic decisionmaking." In the reviewer's opinion, the "major shortcoming of the book lies in the disparity between its theoretical 'ambitions' and its actual accomplishments.... In this book there is no theory and the nontestability of the propositions is immediately obvious."

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1968
  • Pages: 4
  • Document Number: P-3879

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Crecine, John P., Book Review: Inside Bureaucracy by Anthony Downs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1968. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3879.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.