A discussion of the economic and technical advantages of satellite-based instructional radio systems of 50 to 200 channels compared with educational TV and its necessarily more limited number of channels. The argument for radio rather than TV centers around four propositions: (1) The evidence shows no significant difference between the instructional effectiveness of TV and that of radio. (2) An ETV channel would use around 200 times as much of the available radio spectrum as a radio channel. (3) The dollar cost of radio per channel is no more than a tenth or twentieth that of TV. (4) To the extent that the preparation of instructional material may be an important limiting factor, the simplicity and lower cost of radio programming are an argument in its favor. 12 pp. Refs.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.