Experience and Evaluation of a Testing Program in an Underdeveloped Area as a Means of Developing a Road Capacity Estimating Method.

by L. P. Holliday

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback18 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

A report on the results of a series of field tests conducted on roads in Thailand to provide data for the development of a road capacity estimating method. Data accumulated for the five adjoining test routes included road descriptions, photographs, the locations of transition points and bridges, bridge descriptions (and safety), and altitude readings on the mountainous portion of the course. Multiple correlations between the data on speed, width, terrain, condition, surface, day/night, and empty/loaded categories suggest that condition and surface had the most effect on speed and that width and terrain had much less effect. Some of the limitations of this test, such as visual measurement of gap between two trucks, subjective definition of surface condition, and limited combinations of surface, condition, and terrain categories, could be avoided in more extensive tests. For a large test, it might be more feasible and less expensive to operate in the United States. This paper was presented at the Seminar on Road Capacity Estimating Methods sponsored by the Engineer Strategic Studies Group, U.S. Army Map Service, in Washington, D.C., September 1968. (See also P-3914.) 18 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.