Experience and Evaluation of a Testing Program in an Underdeveloped Area as a Means of Developing a Road Capacity Estimating Method.

L. P. Holliday

Expert InsightsPublished 1968

A report on the results of a series of field tests conducted on roads in Thailand to provide data for the development of a road capacity estimating method. Data accumulated for the five adjoining test routes included road descriptions, photographs, the locations of transition points and bridges, bridge descriptions (and safety), and altitude readings on the mountainous portion of the course. Multiple correlations between the data on speed, width, terrain, condition, surface, day/night, and empty/loaded categories suggest that condition and surface had the most effect on speed and that width and terrain had much less effect. Some of the limitations of this test, such as visual measurement of gap between two trucks, subjective definition of surface condition, and limited combinations of surface, condition, and terrain categories, could be avoided in more extensive tests. For a large test, it might be more feasible and less expensive to operate in the United States. This paper was presented at the Seminar on Road Capacity Estimating Methods sponsored by the Engineer Strategic Studies Group, U.S. Army Map Service, in Washington, D.C., September 1968. (See also P-3914.) 18 pp.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Holliday, L. P., Experience and Evaluation of a Testing Program in an Underdeveloped Area as a Means of Developing a Road Capacity Estimating Method. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1968. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3913.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.