Cover: A Note on Handling Uncertainty in Force-Structure Studies.

A Note on Handling Uncertainty in Force-Structure Studies.

Published 1969

by Donald E. Emerson

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages $20.00

The description of preliminary work on a model designed to estimate the U.S. assured destruction capability for specified U.S. and Soviet Union postures. There is no optimization of force mix or balancing of defenses internal to the model. The model is deterministic: Input factors are selected from specified distributions and then all phases of the two-strike campaign are approximated by means of expected-value submodels. The "future best estimate" for each planning factor is determined by a sample drawn from the distribution of current uncertainty. The approach can provide useful insights for the decisionmaker. Based on specified degrees of uncertainty in the several inputs, it is possible to determine the appropriate force mix (or size) to achieve a desired level of confidence at least cost. 9 pp.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.