Cover: Confirmation of Prediction of Geomagnetic Secular Change.

Confirmation of Prediction of Geomagnetic Secular Change.

Published 1969

by Anne B. Kahle, Richard Henry Ball, Joseph C. Cain

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback $20.00

Evidence in support of the findings regarding a strong correlation between the change in the length of day and the change in westward velocity of the eccentric dipole of the geomagnetic field. In 1965, Ball and others made an empirical prediction "that the eccentric dipole (westward) velocity will decrease sharply during the next 5 years." A new model of the geomagnetic field for recent epochs was derived from data recorded by the OGO-2 and OGO-4 spacecraft for intervals from October 1965 through December 1967. Using this model, referred to as POGO (10/68), the motion westward is shown to be 0.114 deg/yr. This new value, shown graphically, confirms the predicted decrease. It also shows a level about equivalent to the level of a period 40 years earlier. 4 pp. Refs. (KB)

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.