An empirical demonstration of the use of Monte Carlo techniques to overcome problems that often arise in cost analysis in developing estimating relationships. It is a common occurrence for the cost analyst to be faced with the situation in which the database is adequate enough to permit regression analysis to be used, but there is insufficient data available to test whether or not the standard assumptions are met. Thus, the analyst must proceed as though the classical conditions hold even though he may have serious reservations as to the validity of these assumptions. This paper examines the results of two distortions of the standard case and compares them with the standard case itself. Rather than contribute to the theory of mathematical statistics, the object of the study is to demonstrate, in a concrete manner, the effects of violating standard assumptions. 25 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.