A preliminary analysis of the progressive dissociation of revolutionary practice from Marxist theory. The major premise of this discussion is that a number of revolutionary movements are showing a parallel trend away from Communist doctrine and the organizational discipline based on ideological authority. Instead, the "New Left" appears to be establishing a different type of revolutionary tradition: immediate, violent action rather than social analysis, and military rather than political and ideological leadership. Contemporary revolutionary activity of this type has occurred on the outer fringe of the Western world as well as in advanced Western countries--with some phenomena in the latter that are not "revolutionary" in the conventional political sense of the word. Such movements might be interpreted broadly as symptoms of a crisis of Western civilization, caused by an unprecedented acceleration of both the external expansion of Western influence and the pace of its internal change. 31 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.