A Model of Long Delays at Busy Airports.
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback35 pages | $20.00 | $16.00 20% Web Discount |
A simple, deterministic queuing model of airport congestion delay costs, and a JOSS program employing it to evaluate airport policy changes. (The AIL and other airport capacity studies have usually used a steady-state queuing model that is misleading or inapplicable when arrival rates become close to or greater than service rates.) This new model takes account of the pattern of arrivals/departures, delay patterns, weather (good/bad), and season (summer/winter). Analysis of about 32,000 flights at Kennedy International shows a total delay cost during 1967-1968 of $25 million; average traffic peaked at 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. and peak average delays occurred two hours later. Results are given for applying the model to evaluate lessened delay from reducing traffic by various means. 35 pp. Ref.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.