Cover: Policy Analysis in the National Space Programs

Policy Analysis in the National Space Programs

Published 1969

by Bruno Augenstein


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback103 pages $30.00

Assessment of the NASA and DOD space programs, with suggestions for goals and policy issues to govern space endeavors in the next decade. A careful review of existing guidelines of the 1958 Space Act reveals that policy implications are not well defined or quantitative for current needs. The difficulty is not that existing space institutions, civil or military, have been unable to state space program objectives, but that those objectives have had few long-term policy implications and have influenced opinion indifferently in shaping and enabling bodies. There is a need for continued development of cost and schedule estimation procedures and an extended public discussion to help shape future policy.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.