Statistical Indications of the Effect of Military Programs on Latin America, 1950-1965.
Expert InsightsPublished 1969
An assessment of the widely held belief that military aid exerts a deleterious effect on economic and political development in Latin America. Although the data are insufficient and at times conflicting, the statistics examined lend weak support to the notion that U.S. military aid programs are not generally conducive to democratic political development. On the other hand, the data contradict the idea that arms burdens in Latin America impede economic growth. In fact, there appears to be a positive relation between arms and growth that is difficult to explain. Perhaps a national spirit of aggressive competitiveness and pride stimulates both economic growth and a large military establishment. 14 pp.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1969
- Pages: 14
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: P-4144
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.