Cover: A Comparative Study of Ionospheric Measurement Techniques.

A Comparative Study of Ionospheric Measurement Techniques.

Published 1969

by Henry G. Booker, E. K. Smith

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback72 pages $25.00

Comparisons are presented of different methods of measuring ionospheric profiles of aeronomically vital parameters. Only comparisons involving closely simultaneous observations at closely the same location are included. Below 100 km, the radio rocket method appears to have the greatest accuracy. Nevertheless, the ground-based partial reflection and wave-interaction methods need to be developed for continuous observation of electron-density profiles. Above 100 km, satellite methods, particularly the topside ionosonde, are important for obtaining global coverage. For accuracy of measurement of electron-density, electron-temperature, ion-temperature, and other vital parameters, ground-based methods, especially the incoherent backscatter radar, are superior in the altitude range of 100-1000 km. 72 pp. Ref. (Authors)

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.