The Comparative Study of Political Elites
ResearchPublished 1969
A discussion of ways to better use the technique of social-background analysis and the considerable body of existing data in the study of national political elites. Comparative analysis is a necessary focus. Trend studies of characteristics of political decisionmakers show that percentages of older, university-educated politicians, as well as workers, increase in three out of four cases. Such analysis of comparative age, education, and occupation illuminates trends, is useful in studying different levels of authority, and clarifies and measures key concepts. It draws on social-background data to test theories and to trace the changing social bases of political elites. Searching for empirical relationships between background variables and political-social-economic change leads to the preliminary conclusion that political competition, dominance of liberal professionals, and slow rates of change are concomitants. Future research should focus on comparative studies of social backgrounds of leaders of countries that have yet to be analyzed.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1969
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 59
- Paperback Price: $23.00
- Document Number: P-4172
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Quandt, William B., The Comparative Study of Political Elites, RAND Corporation, P-4172, 1969. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4172.html
Quandt, William B., The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1969. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4172.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.