Cover: The Big Step from Technology to Operational Systems.

The Big Step from Technology to Operational Systems.

Published 1969

by Giles K. Smith

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback7 pages $20.00

A presentation of the problems involved in moving to an operational V/STOL capability. Because there has been no body of experience on which to base supportable calculations of the value of V/STOL, it has been impossible to justify the cost of a system. Encouraging new trends in the R&D community can now be seen: (1) greater flexibility in development plans, (2) greater freedom in shifting budget allocations, and (3) interest in a new strike system for direct support of battlefield operations. To turn these trends to advantage in the development of V/STOL, information and experience relating to military operation and utilization must be accumulated. The most feasible way to realize this is to build already developed aircraft, such as the C-142 or the Dornier Do 31, rather than to embark on a development plan, either full or limited. 7 pp. (MT)

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.