Clarification of the concept of the quality of life as the ultimate yardstick for evaluating social policies is essential to any meaningful application of it. There are two basic dimensions: (1) the artistic, relating to excellence, and (2) the hedonic, consisting of what people-in-general desire to be happy, or idiosyncratic needs, and of psychological mood. Because man lives a substantially generic and not effectively atomistic life, significance in evaluating social programs lies with consensus happiness requisites. Of these, interpersonal social interrelationships are not socially actionable. There remains a limited number of requisites within the sphere of society acting through the agency of the state, among them health, education, political freedom, equality, and privacy. The prospect remains, however, that a society in which many achieve what most people regard as basic requisites to happiness may yet fail to be altogether happy.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.