The Implications of Geographic-Specificity for Air Pollution Abatement Strategy.

by Alan Carlin

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

A review of a presentation by R. E. Kohn at the Symposium on the Development of Air Quality Standards in Los Angeles in October 1969. Professor Kohn's discussion of air pollution abatement strategy could be expanded by considering an additional strategy wherein each pollution control authority determines which air quality standards are exceeded, establishes progressively smaller annual limits for the emission of corresponding pollutants by specified categories of emitters until the desired air standards are met, and then auctions off permits corresponding to these limits. This approach appears to offer significant advantages over either strategy discussed by Kohn, if the assumption of the geographic-specificity problem (that emissions from all sources, regardless of their location in the airshed, have equal effect on air quality at a receptor point) is ignored. If considered, then restricted auctions with minimum bids equal to the computed emission charges for each district and emission limit would appear optimum. 6 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.