Can Public Construction and Rehabilitation Increase the Quantity of Housing Service Consumed by Low-Income Families?

by Edgar O. Olsen


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback12 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

This paper demonstrates, via a demand theory of Muth, that public construction and rehabilitation have no effect on the long run equilibrium quantity of housing service. This theory makes clear that it is the subsidy which accompanies public construction that results in greater consumption of housing. Under simple assumptions concerning human behavior and market structure, the author deduces the reactions of buyers and sellers of housing service to a government program in which dwelling units are purchased, destroyed, and rebuilt or rehabilitated and then marketed by the government without subsidy. If this public action is unanticipated, then there will be a short run increase in the quantity of housing consumed, but in long run equilibrium the consumption by each individual will be the same as prior to government action. In the case of perfect anticipation, public construction would not even increase the quantity of housing consumed in the short run. 12 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.