A discussion advancing the notion that synthesis of systems analysis, incrementalism, and the clinical approach to policymaking could provide analysts and decisionmakers with a powerful tool for improving policy and programs. While systems analysis is concerned with economic rationality, and incrementalism oriented to political rationality, the clinical or "human relations" approach emphasizes social rationality. With strong ties to T-groups and sensitivity training, it places organizational change at the center of its concerns — an area where both systems analysis and incrementalism are weak. A combined approach offers the advantage of developing a participatory decisionmaking environment within the client organization while creating the order necessary for effective action. The potential: public policy decisions with much enhanced chances for effectiveness at the operational level.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.