Does an Increase in the Price of a Necessity Reduce Welfare More than an Equivalent Increase in the Price of a Luxury?

Joseph P. Newhouse

ResearchPublished 1970

This paper develops an argument to suggest that the price increase that causes the greater decrease in welfare is independent of which good is a "necessity," if necessity is interpreted as low-income or low-price elasticity. A simple two-commodity model expresses utility as a function of medical care and a composite bundle of other goods. Conclusions that hold for the model are assumed to apply to a multicommodity world. An illustration shows the proportion of a city worker's family budget for a moderate living standard allocated to various commodities in 1966. According to this index, shelter, food, and medical care price increases cause a noticeably greater decrease in welfare than other commodity groups. Thus, there may be some reason for concern over recent behavior of medical care prices, but the reason is not that medical care is a "necessity." 8 pp.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
8 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1970
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 8
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4312

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Newhouse, Joseph P., Does an Increase in the Price of a Necessity Reduce Welfare More than an Equivalent Increase in the Price of a Luxury? RAND Corporation, P-4312, 1970. As of September 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4312.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Newhouse, Joseph P., Does an Increase in the Price of a Necessity Reduce Welfare More than an Equivalent Increase in the Price of a Luxury? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1970. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4312.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.