Peruvian Military Relations with the United States.
Expert InsightsPublished 1970
An analysis of Peruvian military structure, history, its role since the 1968 military takeover of government, and the military's relations with the United States before and after assuming political control of the country. The author suggests the latter relationship may have proved counterproductive to U.S. interests; historically conditioned to view the Peruvian military as "politically reactionary, militarily irrelevant, and economically wasteful," the United States has failed to note the breakdown of historical military conservatism. Military and political dimensions of U.S. policy alternatives are discussed. It is concluded that extremes of partisan involvement or outright rejection of the military in government be avoided. 51 pp.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1970
- Pages: 51
- Document Number: P-4389
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.