Sharing the UHF between Space and Terrestrial Services.

John L. Hult

ResearchPublished 1970

Report prepared for the Proceedings of the National Electronics Conference, Chicago, December 7-9, 1970. The demand for spectrum at UHF has exceeded the supply for exclusive use of the contending services. Satellite relays offer great promise for area coverage services to small terminals that will involve more direct users and greater investment than all other services combined. The UHF is the choice portion of the spectrum for these services from the standpoints of both the satellite relay performance and the total system costs. In addition, UHF, with its complete sharing reuse for the new highest-quality space services, can provide double duty without hindering the current terrestrial services or limiting their future development. The most difficult case of sharing between the two types of TV broadcast service was examined in detail; the study showed that sharing will be feasible with adequate margins using earth terminals with small receiving antennas. 8 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
8 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1970
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 8
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4436

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Hult, John L., Sharing the UHF between Space and Terrestrial Services. RAND Corporation, P-4436, 1970. As of September 23, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4436.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Hult, John L., Sharing the UHF between Space and Terrestrial Services. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1970. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4436.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.