Cover: Evaluation and Innovation in Urban Research.

Evaluation and Innovation in Urban Research.

Published 1970

by Garry D. Brewer

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback47 pages $23.00

Analyzes the methodology of computer simulation in the social sciences and its ability to manage complexly organized systems. The "in principle" arguments advanced in support of the method have been insufficiently tempered by honest appraisal of past "in practice" experiences. A continuation of the existing trends could harm both the method and the processes of problemsolving in a social context. An initial problem is the development of an appraisal function--i.e., a series of questions or criteria against which a computer simulation may be judged. The experiences from two empirical contexts are related in efforts to construct a so-called policy-assisting class of simulation models. Deficiencies in the appraisal included the vastly different orientations of participants interviewed, salesmanship, and various technical and theoretical shortcomings. 47 pp.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.