Some Comments on Conceptual Frameworks for Comparing Alternatives
ResearchPublished 1970
Notes used as a basis for informal talks on systems analysis, discussing ways of giving analytical support for long-range planning. The most important function is to provide information that will help decisionmakers compare alternatives. For most long-range planning problems, the specified effectiveness approach and the specified resource constraint approach are likely to be most useful. Theoretically, they are opposites; in practice, however, it is often difficult to formulate equal-effectiveness alternatives, whereas equal-cost alternatives can usually be established. Analysts should provide various quantitative measures of effectiveness, plus qualitative statements and judgments along with results of Delphi or other worth-assessment techniques. Unconstrained benefit/cost ratios are not recommended, since absolute amounts usually are important, and resources are limited.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1970
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 11
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-4506
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Fisher, Gene, Some Comments on Conceptual Frameworks for Comparing Alternatives, RAND Corporation, P-4506, 1970. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4506.html
Fisher, Gene, Some Comments on Conceptual Frameworks for Comparing Alternatives. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1970. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4506.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.