Cover: One American Perspective on Nuclear Guarantees, Proliferation, and Related Alliance Diplomacy.

One American Perspective on Nuclear Guarantees, Proliferation, and Related Alliance Diplomacy.

by Malcolm W. Hoag

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback30 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Argues that, to limit nuclear proliferation, the superpowers should seek arms control quantitative limits that permit modernizing their strategic weapon systems (e.g., MIRVing of missiles). Other nations will complain that such superpower "vertical proliferation" entitles them to evade the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Nonetheless, such superpower modernization should on balance deter nuclear spread by making other nuclear programs (e.g., China's) clearly less cost-effective. To be presented to the Conference sponsored by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, March 9-13, 1971, at Oslo, on the "Role of Nuclear Weapons in the Politics and Defense Planning of Non-Nuclear Weapon States." 30 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.