Risk and Corporate Rates of Return

Reply

Irving Nuttall Fisher, George R. Hall

ResearchPublished 1971

The analysis in P-3725 of the relationship between corporate profits and risks during the period 1950-1964 is extended to include impacts of (1) size of firm, (2) growth in sales, (3) size of industry, (4) industry concentration, and (5) stock price/earnings ratio. The intention is to distinguish not only risk premiums but other functional and nonfunctional components of profit, such as monopoly rents. The result is to narrow the differentials among industry rates of return. Drugs and aerospace, the industries with the highest profit rates in the previous analysis, did not show much decline in adjusted rates of return. The major conclusion is that the distinction between corporate risks arising from factors beyond the control of the firm and those within the control of the firm is a useful concept, but that it should be embodied in a broad analytical framework such as that sketched in this paper.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
7 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1971
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 7
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4559

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Fisher, Irving Nuttall and George R. Hall, Risk and Corporate Rates of Return: Reply, RAND Corporation, P-4559, 1971. As of September 18, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4559.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Fisher, Irving Nuttall and George R. Hall, Risk and Corporate Rates of Return: Reply. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4559.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.