The Sino-Soviet Relationship and Yugoslavia, 1949-1971.

by A. Ross Johnson

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback13 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

A discussion of the impact of Sino-Soviet relations on Yugoslavia during the period 1949-1971. China, a nonregional power with no record of presence or influence in the Balkans, has shaped Soviet policy toward Yugoslavia. The Tito regime in 1949 expected Chinese aid in an ideological struggle with Stalin, but was disappointed. China reinforced anti-Yugoslavism in 1956; Party ties with Moscow were interrupted in 1958, although chilly state relations were maintained. By 1962, Yugoslavia was dependent on the USSR for supplies; she participated in Communist Party meetings; she attempted to neutralize Chinese dogmatism in nonaligned states. This rapprochement with Russia ended with the Czechoslovak invasion. Perceiving this as a threat to Yugoslavian security, Tito revamped the military and reoriented the defense doctrine. He strengthened European relations, improved relations with other Communist countries and with the United States. Yugoslavia at last gained support from Communist China, although the latter cannot guarantee Yugoslavian independence after Tito. 13 pp.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.