The Contemporary City and Contemporary Social Research.

Robert K. Yin

ResearchPublished 1971

Suggests that social scientists have been too concerned with the development of a problem-solving approach to understanding the nature of the city. The concern reflects an inappropriate response to pressures to make social science more relevant; rather than changing the study curriculum to make it more relevant, perhaps what is needed is a change in the social scientists themselves. Increased personal involvement in inner-city life would make them more perceptive of that life style; thus, their studies would be more relevant to the inner city. As for the curriculum and the study of the city, perhaps a better approach than the problem-solving orientation is to revive older, European strands of thought and to study the city as an order of institutions. Such an approach focuses attention on the fact that social interactions and roles, institutional relationships, and structural changes over time are the urban phenomena to be studied and explained. 13 pp. Ref.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
13 pages
List Price
$20.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1971
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 13
  • Paperback Price: $20.00
  • Document Number: P-4680

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Yin, Robert K., The Contemporary City and Contemporary Social Research. RAND Corporation, P-4680, 1971. As of October 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4680.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Yin, Robert K., The Contemporary City and Contemporary Social Research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4680.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.