Centralization versus Decentralization: A Location Analysis Approach for Librarians.
ResearchPublished 1971
An application of location theory to the question of centralized versus decentralized library facilities for a university, with relevance for special libraries. Locating university libraries near classrooms, offices, and dormitories costs more than combining these libraries into a centralized facility. Yet a centralized facility entails a cost to the university community that does not appear in the university budget--a cost in time, energy, and decreased use resulting from locating the library farther from users. By examining economies of scale simultaneously with the cost of overcoming distance, the analyst can determine optimal location and size of libraries for a given level of services. If a campus is to have one centralized library, it should be located where transportation costs to users are minimized for a given level of benefits. For multiple libraries, the factors become more numerous and complex. The analysis provides models for single, multiple, and decentralized libraries. 22 pp. Ref. (Author)
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Available
- Year: 1971
- Print Format: Paperback
- Paperback Pages: 22
- Paperback Price: $20.00
- Document Number: P-4687
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
Shishko, Robert and J. Raffel, Centralization versus Decentralization: A Location Analysis Approach for Librarians. RAND Corporation, P-4687, 1971. As of October 10, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4687.html
Shishko, Robert and J. Raffel, Centralization versus Decentralization: A Location Analysis Approach for Librarians. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1971. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4687.html. Also available in print form.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.