As new ideas are generated for dealing with court congestion and other criminal justice problems, those that appear to be the most promising must eventually be tested in practice. However, it is difficult to determine whether there is any resulting improvement. Accordingly, this paper is addressed to considerations of experimental design, the selection of evaluation criteria, the measurement of court performance, and the assessment of the results of such a test. The principles introduced are discussed in terms of an ongoing evaluation of a major internal reorganization of the New York City criminal court.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.