Long Term Change in Personal Income Distribution

Theoretical Approaches, Evidence and Explanations

T. P. Schultz

ResearchPublished 1972

Discusses specific facts and their alternative interpretations of the inequality of personal incomes in the United States. Logic is presented for adopting one conceptual and statistical approach in measuring and analyzing income disparity. Empirical evidence from 1939 to 1970 is assembled, including income inequality among the fully employed and income disparities by race and sex. Although cyclical behavior of income inequality has been plausibly linked to aggregate indices of demand, economic explanations of secular change in income inequality are less satisfactory. After decades of confidence in the egalitarian redistributive influence of the U.S. economy, a reappraisal of progress toward equalizing economic opportunities may be warranted.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
42 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1972
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 42
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Document Number: P-4767

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Schultz, T. P., Long Term Change in Personal Income Distribution: Theoretical Approaches, Evidence and Explanations, RAND Corporation, P-4767, 1972. As of September 12, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4767.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Schultz, T. P., Long Term Change in Personal Income Distribution: Theoretical Approaches, Evidence and Explanations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1972. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P4767.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.