Choice Among Strategies for System Acquisition.

by Alvin J. Harman

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback22 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

Improving the process of acquiring major weapon systems has been the subject of analyses and policy recommendations for years, yet evidence of improvement is scant. Recent research suggests that the technological advance sought for a system is central to the predictability of costs, and thus to the choice of a development strategy. This result is confirmed when the previous subjective technological assessments are replaced by analytical ones. Moreover, a model is suggested for measuring the influence of strategy variation (using such elements as contract types or parallel development) on program performance (cost, schedule, and technical outcomes). Choice among strategies within a budget constraint can be determined by the utility of performance dimensions to counter threats. Evidence suggests that program performance flexibility is constrained by the acquisition strategy selected. 22 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.